On December 6, SIFMA will host its 2013 Securitization Outlook Conference in New York City, which is set to be a timely and informative conference that will bring together a group of academic and industry leaders to discuss:
- FHFA’s strategic plan, single securitization platform and the near-term outlook for the GSEs
- The status of eminent domain for mortgage loans
- The regulatory and marker outlook for private-label securitization markets
Orrick partner Howard Altarescu will participate in the panel discussion. For more information, please click here.
On July 19, SIFMA announced a new policy that mortgage loans to borrowers residing in jurisdictions that have initiated condemnation proceedings to seize mortgage loans through eminent domain will not be deliverable into TBA-eligible securities on a going-forward basis. SIFMA stated that mortgage loans in areas where these eminent domain powers could be exercised would exhibit unpredictable prepayment behavior and destroy the homogeneity among mortgage loans necessary for the proper functioning of the TBA market. In the event that seizures of mortgage loans occur, SIFMA plans to review the facts and circumstances of the situation periodically and will review its policy in light of any changes. Statement.
On January 14, the ASF announced that its Board of Directors voted to end the ASF’s administrative affiliation with SIFMA. ASF Release.
Agreements were signed over the past weekend with the initial nine institutions electing to participate in Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program. Treasury began delivering $125 billion in capital to those institutions on October 28. A number of regional banks have also applied to receive approximately $35 billion in capital under the program. CPP Transaction Report. Treasury Press Release.
On October 28, SIFMA and ASF jointly issued a comment letter relating to the development of the asset guarantee program authorized under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act and requested that Treasury consider limiting and targeting the circumstances in which the guarantee program might be effectively used. SIFMA/ASF Comment Letter.
Internal Revenue Code Sec. 597 provides for rules to prevent a double tax benefit on the receipt by a bank or S&L of “federal financial assistance” pursuant to section 406(f) of the National Housing Act, section 21A of the Federal Home Loan Bank Act or section 11(f) or 13(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. On October 14, the IRS announced that amounts furnished to financial institutions under TARP will not be treated as “federal financial assistance” within the meaning of Sec. 597. IRS Notice 2008-101.