Europe

European Commission Addendum to Draft RTS on Margin Requirements for Uncleared OTC Derivatives under EMIR

Posted on

On August 2, 2016, the European Commission published an addendum to the draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) on margin requirements for uncleared OTC derivatives under Article 11(15) of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR).  This follows an endorsement by the European Commission on July 28, 2016 of the draft RTS with amendments.  The ESAs will have 6 weeks to respond to these amendments before resubmitting them to the Commission in the form of a formal opinion.

In the addendum, the Commission states that there are some clarifications to be made to the revised draft RTS on margins in Articles 34 and 36 on application timing and in Annex III where a formula is missing. The intention of the Commission is to have the first wave of the initial margin requirements applied from the date one month after the date the RTS enter into force. This was the intention of paragraph 1 in Article 36. However, the Commission considers that the reading of the interaction of paragraph 1 with the other paragraphs in Article 36 is not clear and that the revisions set out in the addendum are therefore necessary.

Association for Financial Markets in Europe Publishes Model Clauses for the Contractual Recognition of Bail-In under Article 55 of BRRD

Posted on

On August 1, 2016, the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) published model clauses for the contractual recognition of bail-in for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of Article 55 of the EU Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD).

Article 55 requires financial institutions in the EU to include clauses in a range of contracts to give contractual effect to a bail-in of the relevant liability in a resolution of the institution. The package contains model contractual terms that market participants can use to comply with Article 55 when issuing debt instruments and certain other contracts governed by the law of a jurisdiction outside the EU. There are two types of model clause contained within the package: one for use with debt liabilities and one for use with “other liabilities.”

The model clauses are designed to be compliant with the BRRD and with certain relevant EU member state legislation implementing the BRRD, as well as with the BRRD Delegated Regulation. The model clauses therefore seek to support cross-border effectiveness of resolution and assist banks with complying with the requirements of Article 55 BRRD.

AFME has stressed that the model clauses are a starting point only. Users are strongly encouraged to consult counsel in the relevant non-EU jurisdiction to ensure that the clause is appropriately modified to reflect any requirements of that non-EU law, and is both effective and enforceable in that jurisdiction.

In an associated press release, AFME expressed its continued concerns with the scope of Article 55 BRRD which is very broad, and requires banks to include contractual recognition clauses in contracts giving rise to all liabilities governed by non-EEA law, save where these are expressly excluded from bail-in under the BRRD. The requirement gives rise to significant challenges, such as where banks are unable to unilaterally amend contracts, as in relation to trade finance and membership of financial market infrastructures. A number of authorities have acknowledged that, in many cases, inserting such a clause is impracticable. However, while several authorities have sought to adopt a pragmatic approach to implementation, there remains some uncertainty and potential inconsistency in application.

AFME therefore believes that a clear and consistent approach across the EU is required to provide banks and counterparties with a clear and workable solution. It considers that the scope of Article 55 should be amended to align it with that agreed at the international level through the Financial Stability Board (FSB). The FSB’s Principles for Cross-border Effectiveness of Resolution Actions propose that the scope should cover instruments eligible for loss-absorbing capacity requirements and any other “debt instruments.” AFME considers that this would provide a much clearer scope of liabilities and significantly reduce the impact on firms, while meeting the objective of ensuring resolvability. It believes that alignment with the FSB’s key attributes is particularly important where inconsistencies in approach could severely impact on the competitiveness of EU banks operating in global markets.

Rating Agency Developments

Posted on

On July 19, 2016, DBRS published its criteria for rating CLOs backed by loans to European SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises).  Report.

On July 18, 2016, Fitch published its criteria for assigning new and existing ratings to sovereign issuers.  Report.

On July 18, 2016, Fitch published an addendum that supplements its counterparty criteria for structured finance and covered bonds.  Report.

On July 14, 2016, DBRS published an update to its criteria for evaluating servicers in North American CMBS transactions.  Report.

On July 14, 2016, DBRS published its criteria for rating European covered bonds.  Report.

On July 14, 2016, DBRS published its master European structured finance surveillance methodology.  Report.

Brexit – What Now For Your Business

, , , and Posted on

So, the UK has voted to leave the EU. Everyone has their own opinion and we’ve all seen the news reports and various viewpoints but what does this result mean for you in practical terms and where do we go from here? Orrick’s EU-UK Working Group is ready and waiting to answer any questions you may have (see contact details at the end of this alert) and in the meantime, here’s our overview of the key issues for your business. READ MORE →

European Commission Adopts Delegated Regulations on RTS Relating to Execution Venues under MiFID II

Posted on

On June 8, 2016, the European Commission adopted the following two Delegated Regulations supplementing the MiFID II Directive (2014/65/EU):

  1. A Delegated Regulation (C(2016) 3333 final) in relation to regulatory technical standards (RTS) surrounding the data to be published by execution venues on the quality of execution of transactions, together with an Annex. For financial instruments subject to the trading obligation, each trading venue and systematic internalizer must, under MiFID II, make available to the public, at no cost and on at least an annual basis, data relating to the quality of execution of transactions on that venue.
  2. A Delegated Regulation (C(2016) 3337 final) in relation to RTS for the annual publication by investment firms of information on the identity of execution venues and on the quality of execution, together with an Annex. Investment firms that execute client orders must, under MiFID II, summarize and make available annually, the top five execution venues in terms of trading volumes where they executed client orders in the preceding year, and information on the quality of execution obtained.

It is now for the Council of the EU and the European Parliament to consider the Delegated Regulations. Subject to any objection, they shall enter into force 20 days after their publication in the Official Journal of the EU (OJ).

European Parliament Votes to Postpone MiFID II Implementation until January 2018

Posted on

On June 7, 2016, the European Parliament published a press release announcing that it has voted to postpone the implementation of MiFID II (the MiFID II Directive (2014/65/EU)) and the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (Regulation 600/2014) (MiFIR)) until January 3, 2018. This grants member states a year’s extension on the original July 3, 2016 deadline to transpose the legislation. The extension was triggered by the European Commission and the European Securities and Markets Authority’s (ESMA) delay in producing the necessary technical standards.

MiFID II intends to close the gaps left by MiFID I. Following the financial crisis, it was introduced to create a single market for investment services and activities, with the aim of improving the competitiveness of EU financial markets. The Parliament, through MiFID II, seemingly aims to introduce: (i) a dedicated regime for the treatment of package transactions with regards to pre-trade transparency obligations; (ii) clarification for the own-account exemption for corporate end-users and securities financing transactions, which are excluded from MiFID transparency obligations; and (iii) a technical cross-referencing issue between the Prospective Directive (2003/71/EC) and MiFID II.

On June 8, the Parliament proceeded to publish the provisional edition of: (i) the text of the legislative proposal for a Directive amending the MiFID II Directive as regards certain dates; and (ii) the text of the legislative proposal amending the MiFIR, the Market Abuse Regulation (Regulation 596/2014) (MAR) and the Regulation on improving securities settlement and regulating central securities depositories (CSDs) (Regulation 909/2014) (CSDR) as regards certain dates.

It now remains for the proposals to be formally adopted by the Council, following which they will be published in the Official Journal of the EU (OJ) and enter into force in line with the timing stipulated in the legislation.

European Commission Adopts Delegated Regulation on RTS on Detailed Records of Financial Contracts under BRRD

Posted on

On June 7, 2016, the European Commission adopted a Delegated Regulation supplementing the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (2014/59/EU) (BRRD). The Delegated Regulation deals with the regulatory technical standards (RTS) on a minimum set of the information on financial contracts that should be contained in the detailed records, together with the circumstances in which the requirement should be imposed (C(2016) 3356 final).

Following submission of draft RTS by the EBA in December 2015, the Commission is entitled, under Article 71 of the BRRD, to adopt delegated regulations which highlight the methodology for assessing the value of assets and liabilities of institutions or entities. The draft RTS state that, should the relevant conditions for resolution be satisfied, an institution must maintain detailed records of financial contracts where it is foreseen that resolution actions would be applied to the institution concerned. The Annex accompanying the Delegated Regulation highlights the minimum list of information on financial contracts.

It is now for the Council of the EU and the European Parliament to consider the Delegated Regulation. Subject to any objection, it will enter into force 20 days after its publication in the Official Journal of the EU (OJ).

ESMA Reminds Firms of their Responsibilities when Selling Bail-In Securities

Posted on

On June 2, 2016, ESMA issued a statement (ESMA/2016/902) reminding banks and investment firms of their responsibility to act in their clients’ best interests when selling bail-in-able financial instruments.  The statement clarifies how credit institutions and investment firms should apply the requirements under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (2004/39/EC) (MiFID) governing the distribution to clients of financial instruments subject to the BRRD resolution regime under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (2014/59/EU).

The statement stresses that firms must comply with their obligations under MiFID and the importance of:

  • Providing investors with up-to-date, complete information drafted under the supervision of the compliance function.
  • Managing potential conflicts of interest, in particular, when a firm sells its own bail-in financial instruments directly to its customers (self-placement).
  • Ensuring the product is suitable and appropriate for the investor, which may entail collecting more in-depth information about the client than usual to reflect the fact a client could lose money without the firm entering into insolvency.

In an accompanying press release, ESMA explained that under the BRRD rules, which came into force in January 2016, firms are likely to issue a significant amount of potentially loss-bearing instruments to fulfil their obligations and raised its concern that investors (in particular retail investors) are unaware of the risks they may face when buying these instruments.

European Commission Adopts MiFIR Delegated Regulation on RTS on Access to Benchmarks

Posted on

On June 2, 2016, the European Commission adopted a Delegated Regulation supplementing the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (Regulation 600/2014) (MiFIR) with regard to regulatory technical standards (RTS) on access in respect of benchmarks (C(2016) 3203 final).

MiFIR provides for the non-discriminatory access for central counterparties (CCPs) and trading venues to licences of, and information relating to, benchmarks that are used to determine the value of some financial instruments for trading and clearing purposes.

The Delegated Regulation lays down the list of information to be provided to a trading venue or CCP, the conditions under which access must be granted as well as specifications on non-discriminatory treatment. It also sets out the standards for determining how a benchmark can be considered to be new, and hence benefit from transitory arrangements.

Following adoption of the Delegated Regulation by the Commission, it will be considered by the Council of the EU and the European Parliament. If neither of them objects, the Delegated Regulation states that it will enter into force 20 days after its publication in the Official Journal of the EU (OJ) and will apply from the date referred to in the fourth paragraph of Article 55 of MiFIR.

Commission Adopts Proposal to Incorporate ESAs into EEA Agreement

Posted on

On June 2, 2016, the European Commission published a press release announcing that it had adopted a proposal for a Council decision on the position to be taken by the EU on the incorporation of the Regulations on the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), and some of the related Regulations and Directives, into the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA).

The acts to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement include the ESAs Regulations (EBA, EIOPA and ESMA Regulations), the European Systemic Risk Board Regulation, the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive and related Delegated Acts, the Short Selling Regulation and related delegated acts, the European Markets Infrastructure Regulation (‘EMIR’) and the Credit Ratings Agency Regulations.

This is an important step towards the extension of the European System of Financial Supervision (ESFS) to the EEA EFTA countries: Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein. The Commission explained that incorporating these acts into the EEA Agreement would ensure strong and co-ordinated financial supervision throughout the EEA.