Investment Banks

The Impact of New Financial Regulation on Investment Banks

The results of a study into the impact of EU regulation in the wake of the financial crisis have been published. New rules introduced since the 2007/09 financial crisis required banks to hold more capital for trading activities, making these areas less profitable and prompting cuts to trading desks. This has led investment banks’ balance sheets supporting trading markets to decrease by 20% since 2010, and by 40% in risk-weighted asset teams. It is estimated that European investment banks will shrink by another 14% on aggregate in the next two years.

The report also said that “for banks, the diminishing returns on capital from market-making call for more and fast structural change,” and estimated that for banks to improve their return on equity to above 10%, they would need to deliver 2 to 3 percentage points of return on equity improvement from restructuring.

Six Found Guilty of Insider Dealing

On July 23, the FSA published a press release announcing that six people have been convicted of offences of disclosure of inside information and dealing whilst in possession of confidential and price sensitive information in respect of six companies’ stocks. A seventh defendant, was acquitted of insider dealing. Press Release.

Between May 2006 and May 2008, the defendants obtained confidential and price-sensitive information from investment banks concerning proposed or forthcoming takeover bids. They then used this information to place spread bets ahead of those announcements knowing that when the information became public knowledge the price would rise. The defendants made a combined profit of £732,044.59. This was the longest and most complex prosecution brought by the FSA to date. On July 27, the six defendants were sentenced to jail for a total of 16 years.

FDIC Brings Two RMBS Lawsuits Against Several Investment Banks and Related Entities

On May 18, 2012, the FDIC, in its capacity as receiver for two failed banks, filed two actions in the Southern District of New York arising out of the banks’ alleged purchase of RMBS. In the first suit, the FDIC asserts claims on behalf of Citizens National Bank and Strategic Capital Bank that arise out of the banks’ investment in ten RMBS certificates worth $140.5 million issued and/or underwritten by the defendants, including Bear Stearns, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Merrill Lynch, and Deutsche Bank. Complaint.  In the second suit, the FDIC asserts claims on behalf of Strategic Capital Bank arising out of the bank’s investment in five RMBS certificates worth $31 million underwritten by JP Morgan, Citigroup, Bank of America, and Deustche Bank. Complaint.  In both suits, the FDIC alleged that the defendant banks violated Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 by making material misstatements and omissions in the certificates’ registration statements regarding, among other things, the loan to value ratios of the mortgages underlying the certificates, the appraisal standards used in connection with the appraisals of the underlying properties, whether the borrowers intended to occupy the properties as their primary residences, and whether the originators complied with their underwriting guidelines when originating the underlying mortgages. The FDIC seeks a combined total of $77 million in damages, plus attorneys’ fees and costs.