regulation

European Commission Report on Credit Rating Agencies Regulation

Posted on

 

On October 19, 2016, the European Commission published a report (COM(2016) 664 final) responding to reporting obligations set out in Regulation 1060/2009 (CRA Regulation).

The report:

  • Analyzes references to external credit ratings in EU legislation and in private contracts among parties in financial markets.
  • Assesses potential alternatives to external credit ratings that are currently used by market participants in the EU. The Commission is of the view that there are currently no feasible alternatives that could entirely replace external credit ratings.
  • Evaluates the impact of the CRA Regulation on governance and internal procedures of CRAs, in particular the prevention of conflict of interests and the use of alternative remuneration models.
  • Analyzes the provisions relating to structured finance instruments (SFIs) and their potential extension to other asset classes. The Commission does not think it is appropriate to extend CRA Regulation provisions to other financial products.
  • Assesses the impact and effectiveness of the CRA Regulation’s measures concerning competition in the credit rating industry. Given some provisions are still in the process of implementation, the Commission will continue monitoring the development of the market before considering the adoption of further measures. More generally, the Commission will seek to avoid and further reduce regulatory barriers to market entry.
  • Considers the feasibility of establishing a European CRA for the assessment of sovereign debt and a European credit rating foundation for all other credit ratings. The Commission considers there to be no need at present for a European CRA specialized in sovereign debt or for other credit ratings.

European Commission TTIP Advisory Group Report Considers Financial Services Under TTIP

Posted on

 

On October 17, 2016, the European Commission published a report documenting the meeting of the Commission’s Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) Advisory Group on September 6, 2016.

Financial services are considered at section 4 of the report in the context of TTIP. The group notes that the EU tabled its offer on financial services market access in July 2016 (see Legal update, European Commission releases EU financial services offer for 14th round of TTIP negotiations: July 2016) . Discussions relating to this offer will continue during the next round of TTIP negotiations in October 2016.

The report also refers to the new joint EU-U.S. Financial Regulatory Forum, which was launched in July 2016 with the aim of making continued efforts to improve EU-U.S. regulatory coherence (see Legal update, EU and US establish joint financial regulatory forum ). The EU would like to see the work of the forum “linked into” the final TTIP agreement because, for the EU, the real issue for the financial services sector in the transatlantic context is regulatory transparency and cooperation. Diverging regulation may have negative implications on trade in financial services, financial stability, and consumer protection.

At the meeting, the group also discussed transparency (members expressed an interest in seeing documents related to financial services regulatory cooperation), domestic and international legislation (neither the U.S. nor the EU is seeking, through the forum, to revise the other’s legislation), the TTIP market access offer in financial services (prudential measures, such as capital requirements for banks, are not covered as these are out of scope) and measures to help consumers navigate transatlantic financial services (such as reduced charges for international transfers and simpler opening of bank accounts).

ECB Amends Eligibility Criteria for Unsecured Bank Bonds

Posted on

 

On October 5, 2016, the European Central Bank (“ECB”) stated that it will be making changes to its collateral framework by revising the collateral eligibility criteria and risk control measures in relation to senior unsecured debt instruments issued by credit institutions or investment firms (unsecured bank bonds or UBBs).

Under the current rules, UBBs will, except for these new changes, become ineligible on January 1, 2017. The ECB’s revisions to its collateral framework are aimed at temporarily maintaining the eligibility of UBBs (including the eligibility of statutorily subordinated UBBs that are not also contractually subordinated), beyond January 1, 2017.

Furthermore, UBBs will also be subject to additional risk control measures to remain eligible. The ECB has decided to reduce, as of January 1, 2017, the usage limit for uncovered bank bonds from 5% to 2.5%. The reduction will not apply where:

  • the value of such assets is equal to or less than €50 million (net of any applicable haircut); or
  • such assets are guaranteed (by a public sector entity that has the right to levy taxes) by way of a guarantee that complies with the provisions of Article 114 of the ECB Guideline on the implementation of the Eurosystem monetary policy framework.

The changes are expected to come into effect from January 1, 2017.

EBA Consults on Fee Terminology and Disclosure Documents under Payment Accounts Directive

Posted on

 

Pursuant to the Payment Accounts Directive (2014/92/EU) (PAD), on September 22, 2016, the European Banking Authority (EBA) published a consultation paper on draft technical standards on fee terminology and disclosure documents under the directive.

The EBA will be holding a public hearing at its premises on 21 November 2016 and the consultation process closes on December 22, 2016.

Following the consultation the EBA set out the following three draft technical standards:

  • Draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) setting out the standardized terminology for services that are common to at least a majority of member states (required under Article 3(4) of the PAD).
  • Draft implementing technical standards (ITS) relating to the standardization of presentation format on the fee information document (FID) and its common symbol (required under Article 4(6) of the PAD).
  • Draft ITS relating to a standardized presentation format of the statement of fees (SoF) and its common symbol (required under Article 5(4) of the PAD).

The draft technical standards aim to standardize eight terms for services that are to be used by payment service providers (PSPs), as well as providing consumer-friendly definitions of these terms in all EU official languages. The EBA identified the terminology based on the national provisional lists that member states have developed in line with the EBA’s March 2015 guidelines on standardized fee terminology (see Legal update, EBA final report and guidelines on national provisional lists of the most representative services linked to a payment account and subject to a fee).

PSPs will have to use the proposed standardized terminology in the pre-contractual FID and the post-contractual SoF disclosure documents.

European Commission Adopts Implementing Regulation on ITS for Reporting Results of Internal Approach Calculations under Article 78(2) CRD IV Directive

Posted on

 

On September 19, 2016, the European Commission adopted an Implementing Regulation implementing technical standards (ITS) for templates, definitions and IT solutions to be used by institutions when reporting the results of their internal approach calculations to the European Banking Authority (EBA) and to competent authorities under the CRD IV Directive (2013/36/EU).

The Implementing Regulation is based on the draft ITS submitted by the EBA to the Commission in March 2015 to which the EBA published an opinion agreeing to the Commission’s amendments to the ITS in May 2016. Once the Implementing Regulation has been published in the Official Journal of the EU (OJ) it will enter into force on the 20th day following its publication.

CFTC Extends Comment Period on Proposed Amendments to Regulation 4.22 Regarding CPO Annual Reports

Posted on

 

On August 30, 2016, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission extended the comment period for proposed amendments to a regulation regarding Annual Reports from commodity pool operators. Press release.

SEC Adopts Amendments Providing Authorities Access to Data Obtained by Security-Based Swap Data Repositories

Posted on

 

On August 29, 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission amended a rule designed to provide access for regulators to data in the security-based swap market.  The amendments were enacted to make the sharing of information more secure and efficient. Press release,

EBA Publishes Report on Leverage Ratio Requirements under Article 511 of the CRR

Posted on

On August 3, 2016, the European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report on the leverage ratio (LR) requirements under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).

The EBA report recommends the introduction of a minimum LR requirement in the EU to mitigate the risk of excessive leverage, which is in line with the discussions held by the Group of Central Bank Governors and Heads of Supervision (GHOS) – the governing body of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) – in January 2016.

The analysis suggests that the potential impact of introducing a LR requirement of 3 percent on the provision of financing by credit institutions would be relatively moderate, while, overall, it should lead to more stable credit institutions. Similarly, on the basis of econometric analysis, it has been estimated that risk taking should not be strongly affected. The EBA considers that the introduction of a 3 percent LR should lead to more stable credit institutions overall and the combined application of a risk-based ratio and a LR requirement will reduce the overall cyclicality of capital requirements.

The EBA also assessed the exposure of different categories of credit institutions to the risk of excessive leverage (REL) concluding that the results do not give a strong indication of differences in the degree of exposure to REL across different types of credit institutions. However, global systemically important institutions (GSIIs) show a higher exposure to REL and therefore a higher LR requirement may be warranted.

The report also flags that while the Basel LR standard fits well with the EU banking sector, the same cannot be said for all business models covered by other EU prudential regulations. For example, the EBA recommends that central counterparties (CCPs) and central securities depositaries (CSDs) be exempted. The report describes the characteristics of various specialized business models, such as public development banks, concluding that there is little room for differentiating the LR without opening the door to cases of circumvention of the basic principles of the LR. The report did not find evidence to exempt certain credit institutions from being subject to compliance with the LR minimum requirement of 3 percent on the basis of their limited size. However, the EBA will explore in more detail a reduced frequency and granularity of reporting requirements in the case of smaller credit institutions in future updates of the implementing technical standards (ITS) on LR reporting.

The Commission is required to submit a report on the impact and effectiveness of the LR, and potential legislative proposals, to the European Parliament and the Council of the EU by December 31, 2016.

European Commission Addendum to Draft RTS on Margin Requirements for Uncleared OTC Derivatives under EMIR

Posted on

On August 2, 2016, the European Commission published an addendum to the draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) on margin requirements for uncleared OTC derivatives under Article 11(15) of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR).  This follows an endorsement by the European Commission on July 28, 2016 of the draft RTS with amendments.  The ESAs will have 6 weeks to respond to these amendments before resubmitting them to the Commission in the form of a formal opinion.

In the addendum, the Commission states that there are some clarifications to be made to the revised draft RTS on margins in Articles 34 and 36 on application timing and in Annex III where a formula is missing. The intention of the Commission is to have the first wave of the initial margin requirements applied from the date one month after the date the RTS enter into force. This was the intention of paragraph 1 in Article 36. However, the Commission considers that the reading of the interaction of paragraph 1 with the other paragraphs in Article 36 is not clear and that the revisions set out in the addendum are therefore necessary.

Association for Financial Markets in Europe Publishes Model Clauses for the Contractual Recognition of Bail-In under Article 55 of BRRD

Posted on

On August 1, 2016, the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) published model clauses for the contractual recognition of bail-in for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of Article 55 of the EU Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD).

Article 55 requires financial institutions in the EU to include clauses in a range of contracts to give contractual effect to a bail-in of the relevant liability in a resolution of the institution. The package contains model contractual terms that market participants can use to comply with Article 55 when issuing debt instruments and certain other contracts governed by the law of a jurisdiction outside the EU. There are two types of model clause contained within the package: one for use with debt liabilities and one for use with “other liabilities.”

The model clauses are designed to be compliant with the BRRD and with certain relevant EU member state legislation implementing the BRRD, as well as with the BRRD Delegated Regulation. The model clauses therefore seek to support cross-border effectiveness of resolution and assist banks with complying with the requirements of Article 55 BRRD.

AFME has stressed that the model clauses are a starting point only. Users are strongly encouraged to consult counsel in the relevant non-EU jurisdiction to ensure that the clause is appropriately modified to reflect any requirements of that non-EU law, and is both effective and enforceable in that jurisdiction.

In an associated press release, AFME expressed its continued concerns with the scope of Article 55 BRRD which is very broad, and requires banks to include contractual recognition clauses in contracts giving rise to all liabilities governed by non-EEA law, save where these are expressly excluded from bail-in under the BRRD. The requirement gives rise to significant challenges, such as where banks are unable to unilaterally amend contracts, as in relation to trade finance and membership of financial market infrastructures. A number of authorities have acknowledged that, in many cases, inserting such a clause is impracticable. However, while several authorities have sought to adopt a pragmatic approach to implementation, there remains some uncertainty and potential inconsistency in application.

AFME therefore believes that a clear and consistent approach across the EU is required to provide banks and counterparties with a clear and workable solution. It considers that the scope of Article 55 should be amended to align it with that agreed at the international level through the Financial Stability Board (FSB). The FSB’s Principles for Cross-border Effectiveness of Resolution Actions propose that the scope should cover instruments eligible for loss-absorbing capacity requirements and any other “debt instruments.” AFME considers that this would provide a much clearer scope of liabilities and significantly reduce the impact on firms, while meeting the objective of ensuring resolvability. It believes that alignment with the FSB’s key attributes is particularly important where inconsistencies in approach could severely impact on the competitiveness of EU banks operating in global markets.