Alex Sobolev

Senior Associate

London


Read full biography at www.orrick.com

Alex Sobolev advises on compliance, risks and strategy for operating business online. His practice focuses on data protection matters, but intersects with consumer law, software development and crypto.

Alex’s multidisciplinary practice and transatlantic experience enable him to provide strategic commercial advice for technology led companies, including coordinating and implementing data and consumer risk mitigation projects, providing outsourcing advice and developing key legal risk mitigation strategies in relation to products where the pace of innovation nearly always outpaces the law.

He has advised companies at all stages of the corporate lifecycle, from software development and product launch, through technology licensing, sale and purchase, to mergers and acquisitions of data and tech-heavy businesses. He has assisted organisations with the design, development and implementation of global data protection and compliance policies, as well the management of risk and security associated with data retention, processing and transfer.

Posts by: Alexei Sobolev

Steps Towards a Capital Markets Union

The European Commission is consulting on a blueprint for creating a harmonized capital market across the EU, to facilitate capital raising in the EU while maintaining consumer and investor protection by simplifying the prospectus regime. The Commission is also consulting on an EU framework for securitization, hoping to improve credit information for SMEs, and is supporting the EU Private Placement Initiative. The consultation asks whether an EU private placement market should be created, with some of the same features as the successful US model for fixed rate debt instruments.

The review and capital markets union consultation will close on May 13, 2015, with a report expected by July 2015.  Overview.

EBA’s Recommendations to Non-EU and Review of EU Supervisory Authorities

The European Banking Authority has published a recommendation setting out its opinion on the confidentiality regime of several non-EU supervisory authorities to facilitate their participation in supervisory colleges overseeing international banks, led by EU supervisors.

The EBA expects all competent authorities to which the recommendation is addressed to comply with it and incorporate it into their supervisory practices as appropriate. The competent authorities must notify the EBA as to whether they have complied or intend to comply by June 2, 2015.

In a separate report, the EBA has identified that supervisory authorities across the EU have made significant progress towards improving the convergence of their supervisory practices since 2011 though some differences remain. The report covers the findings of an assessment carried out over the past 3 years, and focuses on Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process and assessment of risks, supervisory stress testing, ongoing review of internal models, and supervisory measures and powers.

ESMA to Centralize Instrument Reference and Trade Repositories Data

The European Securities and Markets Authority (“ESMA”) has launched two major projects at the request of a number of National Competent Authorities (“NCAs”): the Instrument Reference Data Project and the Trade Repositories Project. The former envisages ESMA providing a central facility in relation to instrument and trading data and the calculation of transparency and liquidity thresholds required in relation to the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (“MiFIR”), while under the latter ESMA is to provide a single access point to trade repositories data under EMIR.

The request involves a delegation of some of the NCAs’ tasks related to data collection requirements under MiFIR and the Market Abuse Directive to ESMA, as well as the creation of a central access point for regulators to data of the EU’s six trade repositories. ESMA will collect data directly from market infrastructures, and make it available to NCAs and the public through a centralized system. Centralization of these functions is expected to save on costs compared with building similar systems in each country, lowering the burden on the financial system and EU taxpayers, while also working towards harmonization and support of the single market. The Instrument Reference Data Project is expected to go live in early 2017, and the Trade Repositories Project in 2016.

The Impact of New Financial Regulation on Investment Banks

The results of a study into the impact of EU regulation in the wake of the financial crisis have been published. New rules introduced since the 2007/09 financial crisis required banks to hold more capital for trading activities, making these areas less profitable and prompting cuts to trading desks. This has led investment banks’ balance sheets supporting trading markets to decrease by 20% since 2010, and by 40% in risk-weighted asset teams. It is estimated that European investment banks will shrink by another 14% on aggregate in the next two years.

The report also said that “for banks, the diminishing returns on capital from market-making call for more and fast structural change,” and estimated that for banks to improve their return on equity to above 10%, they would need to deliver 2 to 3 percentage points of return on equity improvement from restructuring.

European Commission Plans to Vet Gas and Energy Contracts and Its Approach to Russian Suppliers

A proposal to grant the European Commission a role in vetting gas supply contracts across the EU has been met with fierce resistance from the member states. The current proposal is another element of the EU’s broader initiative to create an “energy union,” as recommended by the Commission in its framework strategy in late February this year and initially approved on Thursday, March 19, 2015 to lower prices and improve the security of its gas and electricity supplies. The latest draft proposal suggests involving the Commission in all agreements with external suppliers that may affect EU energy security.

FCA Publishes Structured Products Review

The UK Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) has published a review of structured product governance, in which it has criticized the ways in which instruments are developed and sold. The review contained six key points:

  1. Retail consumers generally struggle to understand the relative merits of structured products and the factors driving potential returns, finding it difficult to compare alternatives and to make full use of analytical information. The FCA has claimed that it is up to firms to remedy this.
  2. Firms’ senior management must do more to put customers at the forefront of their approach to product performance, identifying a key target market during product design, which should then inform each subsequent part of product development and distribution.
  3. Structured products should have a reasonable prospect of delivering economic value to customers in the target market, to be determined and evidenced by robust stress testing as part of product approval.
  4. Firms need to provide customers with clear and balanced information on each product and any risks.
  5. Manufacturers need to strengthen the monitoring of their products, including ensuring distributors have enough information about the manufacturer’s product to sell it appropriately.
  6. Firms need to do more to ensure fair treatment of customers throughout the lifecycle of a structured product.

While these points are quite broad, the FCA has warned that failure by firms to improve in respect of the above may lead to new binding rules.

European Commission Unveils Tax Transparency Package

The European Commission has laid out its plans in a new Tax Transparency Package to clamp down on tax deals made between EU governments and multi-national corporations. As of next year, EU members would have to declare their cross border tax rulings every three months, as well as divulging information on existing deals. The Package comes during ongoing investigations into a number of member states’ tax regimes, and concerns that tax rulings which give a low level of taxation in one member state can entice companies to shift profits there artificially, leading to serious erosion of possible tax revenues for other member states.

In particular, the Commission is investigating deals between multinationals and governments in Luxembourg, Ireland, the Netherlands, and Belgium, and whether some of these agreements amounted to state aid. Last year, allegations emerged that around 340 multinational companies had tax avoidance deals with Luxembourg.

European Court Rules in Favor of the UK in ECB Dispute Over the Relocation of Clearing Houses

After a three year dispute over the place of the City of London in Europe’s single market, the EU General Court has ruled that the European Central Bank (“ECB”) lacked the legal powers to enforce a ban on clearing and settlement of euro-denominated deals in the UK. The ECB’s 2011 policy required all clearing houses that handle more than €5 billion euros per day per product category to move inside the Eurozone, claiming this would make it easier to oversee the clearing and settlement activities of such organizations. Though never implemented in practice, the policy was challenged by the UK on grounds that it went against the single market.

For the UK an unsuccessful challenge would have forced the London Stock Exchange’s LCH. Clearnet clearing house, which clears about €250 billion euro-denominated instruments every day, and ICE Clear Europe, the world’s largest processor of credit default swaps, to shift large portions of their euro-denominated operations to continental Europe, resulting in the loss of London’s financial center’s influence to the Eurozone and further ammunition for anti-EU campaigners in the lead up to the May national elections.

The General Court found that the ECB policy went beyond oversight to regulating market infrastructure companies – a power the ECB does not have as its competence is limited to payment systems under Article 127 (2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The Court did not address the question of whether the ECB policy had discriminated against UK operators or undermined the fundamental freedoms on which the EU single market is based. These issues could be further considered in the event of an appeal by the ECB to the Court of Justice of the European Union, or a proposal to grant the ECB the necessary authority through EU legislation.

Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) (Amendment) Order 2015

On February 25, 2015, the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) (Amendment) Order 2015 (SI 2015/369) was published with an explanatory memorandum.

The Order comes into force on April 1, 2015, and implements the recommendations of the Fair and Effective Markets Review (set out in a report dated August 2014) to extend the existing UK regulatory and legislative framework for benchmarks to include the additional benchmarks, which are used in the fixed income, commodity and currency markets .The order therefore amends:

  • Schedule 5 to the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001 (SI 2001/544) by extending the existing UK regulatory and legislative framework, in addition to governing the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), to apply also to ISDAFIX, Sterling Overnight Index Average (SONIA), Repurchase Overnight Index Average (RONIA), WM/Reuters (WMR) 4pm London Closing Spot Rate, London Gold Fixing, LMBA Silver Price and ICE Brent Index; and
  • The Financial Services Act 2012 (Misleading Statements and Impressions) Order 2013 (SI 2013/637), which specifies the relevant activities, investments and benchmarks for the purposes of a criminal offence in section 91 of the Financial Services Act 2012 (that is, making false or misleading statements in relation to benchmarks), to bring the additional benchmarks into its scope.

The FCA has consulted on bringing the additional benchmarks into its regulatory and supervisory regime and intends to publish a policy statement and final Handbook text in the first quarter of 2015 with a view to the relevant provisions being in force when the Order takes effect.

ECB Launches Landmark €1.1 Trillion Quantitative Easing Program

The ECB announced on Thursday that it would start its purchase of sovereign bonds on March 9 to support an accelerating economic recovery in the Eurozone, and would continue to do so until there was a “sustained adjustment in the path of inflation”. It is expected that this scheme will push GDP expansion to 1.5% this year, 1.9% in 2016, and 2.1% in 2017, compared with December projections of 1% and 1.5% for 2015 and 2016 respectively, and will also drive inflation back up to 1.8% by the end of 2017.

The announcement has already had an impact on the bond market, as buyers drove the yield on Italy’s 10-year benchmark down to a new record low of 1.34%, and the German equivalent to 0.34%. Some analysts have argued that the program could further distort the bond market where the shorter-term debt of several countries already has negative yields. However, ECB President Mario Draghi said that the ECB would continue to buy bonds provided the yields were above the central bank’s deposit rate of minus 0.2% (in effect limiting the price the ECB would pay for government debt).