Employment Law and Litigation

Orrick

Employment Law and Litigation

  • Home
  • Orrick Blogs

Noel Canning

Compelling Individual Arbitration Violates National Labor Relations Act? It Does According to ALJ

Lisa Lupion and Mike DelikatPosted on January 28, 2014

People at a Table

Joining the ever growing list of opinions on the arbitrability of class claims, an NLRB Administrative Law Judge recently ruled that an arbitration agreement that did not expressly bar workers from bringing class or collective actions still violated federal labor law because the employer’s steps taken to enforce the agreement in court had the practical effect of doing so. READ MORE →

Posted in Arbitration, Class Action, Employment Law, NLRB Tagged Administrative Law Judge, ALJ, arbitability, arbitration, arbitration agreement, Belgrove Post Acute Care Center, cease and desist, claimant, Class Action, class claims, collective action, D.C. Circuit, D.R. Horton, Employment Law, employment-related disputes, enforce, enforcement, federal courts, Fifth Circuit, Fourth Circuit, G4S Regulated Security Solutions, individual claims, judicial, jurisdiction, Manor West, motion to compel, motion to dismiss, National Labor Relations Act, National Labor Relations Board, NLRA, NLRB, Noel Canning, PAGA, precedent, precluding, President Obama, Private Attorney General Act, recess appointment, representative action, respondent, Section 7, Section 8(a)(1), Stolt-Nielson, Supreme Court, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, violation, waiver
 

Print Page

Search

Awards and Recognition

Categories

Submit
  • Legal Notices
  • Privacy Notice
  • Cookie Notice
  • Modern Slavery
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Transparency Information
  • Manage Cookies
© 2023 Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP. All rights reserved.