According to a recent decisions of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) (May 14, 2019 – C‑55/18), the Member States of the EU must oblige employers to systematically record the working time of their employees. Only in this way can it be ensured and enforced that the working time rules are observed and that the intended health protection of the employees is guaranteed. READ MORE
Dr. André Zimmermann, LL.M.
Dr. André Zimmermann, a Certified Specialist for Employment Law (Fachanwalt für Arbeitsrecht), heads Orrick’s German Employment Practice. With well more than ten years of international experience, André is well-versed in restructuring and headcount reduction, employment aspects of M&A transactions, and employment related litigation.
André is listed as "frequently recommended" employment law expert by JUVE Handbook of German Commercial Law Firms, editions 2017/2018 and 2018/2019, Germany's leading lawyer ranking, and has been ranked as top employment lawyer by renown German business weekly WirtschaftsWoche 2019. Clients recommend André to JUVE as “straight shooter" and "always refreshingly honest".
Our clients praise André's "creative and efficient style of working" and "a very practical and efficient style of providing advice", referring to him as "extremely responsive and accessible when we have urgent matters" and as "an excellent advocate in court hearings".
André advises companies on a wide range of HR legal matters with a special sector focus on technology companies, including hiring and discrimination concerns, misclassification, multi-jurisdictional and cross-border employment issues, HR data privacy compliance, roll out of employee handbooks and policies, performance management and terminations.
Most recently, André has advised leading multinational technology companies such as AppAnnie, Facebook, Flexera, GitHub, NVIDIA, Optimizely, Sabre, Sensata Technologies, Splunk and The Trade Desk on various employment matters in Germany.
Having long-standing experience in negotiating with works councils and unions in restructuring measures of all kind, a special focus of André's practice is on restructuring, outsourcing and headcount reductions. He is an acknowledged specialist in employing third-party personnel, especially through temporary agency work.
André is a core member of our global employment practice consisting of 70 specialized employment lawyers and world leading practices in our offices in the United States, Asia and Europe, offering the highest level of employment advice in all major jurisdictions. Our well-established teamwork across offices ensures international advice in employment law in our clients' cross-border projects.
Posts by: André Zimmermann
Very recently, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) held that an automatic forfeiture of vacation entitlements or vacation compensation entitlements without prior notification of the employee contravenes EU law. The German Federal Labor Court (Bundesarbeitsgericht, BAG) now has joined this case law in its decision of February 19, 2019. This requires employers to take action. READ MORE
On January 1, 2019, new employee entitlements to a temporary reduction in working time will come into force in Germany. We answer the 10 most important questions employers have. READ MORE
The German Federal Vacation Act (Bundesurlaubsgesetz) provides that vacation has to be approved and taken in the current calendar year. The employee is meant to actually take the vacation and enjoy a rest. READ MORE
Undoubtedly driven by an interest in drawing UK-based banks to Frankfurt and becoming an EU hub for US banks post-Brexit, the German government recently picked up a proposal to relax dismissal protection for high-earning bankers. So it may very well soon be easier for banks in Frankfurt to part with their top employees. READ MORE
The German Federal Labor Court (judgment of March 20, 2018 – 1 ABR 15/17) has recently clarified a matter of considerable practical relevance for U.S. companies offering stock options to employees of their Germany-based subsidiaries: Does the German subsidiary’s works council have a right to be involved when it comes to offering stock options? READ MORE
A recent ruling of the Federal Labor Court will invalidate thousands of forfeiture clauses in employment contracts in Germany. Companies need to review and revise their standard employment contracts now and explore options to amend existing contracts to exclude potential liabilities. Otherwise there may be significant exposure for the employer. The time to act is now! READ MORE
Due to increased awareness and reporting triggered by the international #metoo discussion, besides taking preventive measures, it is crucial for companies with employees in Germany to know what internal actions to take in the event an employee reports an incident of sexual harassment at the workplace. READ MORE
Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht, BVerfG) has ruled that there must be the option of registering a gender that is neither male nor female on birth certificates. The introduction of a third gender will raise questions for employers too, in particular with regard to gender discrimination.
In late 2017, the BVerfG held that the constitutional rights of individuals who cannot be permanently categorized as belonging to either the male or the female gender are being violated if the law on civil status requires them to register their gender while not allowing any entry other than a positive gender definition as either male or female.
The case was brought by a registered female whose chromosome testing revealed that they were neither of female or male sex. The plaintiff had brought the action after several lower courts had ruled against a bid to introduce the gender options “inter” or “diverse” in the birth register.
In Germany it has been possible since 2013 to leave the gender box blank on the birth certificate or refer to the option “not stated” for people born with characteristics of both males and females. However, the court held that referring those affected to these options does not suffice and is unconstitutional.
According to the grounds, the German constitution protects the sexual identity of a person given that this is at the core of an individual’s personal identity and social perception. This protection also covers the positive description of one’s gender.
Now, the German legislature has until December 31, 2018, to implement new regulations in line with the BVerfG’s guidelines. The category could be called “inter” or “diverse.” Once the law is passed, Germany would become the first European country to offer intersex people the option of identifying as a designation other than male or female.
Some countries, including Australia and New Zealand, do recognize intersex as an option on official documents. In 2015, a law introduced in New York resulted in more than 700 people changing their birth certificates to “intersex.” In 2017, California became the second U.S. state to allow for such change.
Until the new law has passed, according to the court, courts and state authorities should no longer compel intersex people to choose between identifying as male or female. It is highly likely that a third gender will be introduced by such law. In employment law, too, this raises new questions, particularly in relation to discrimination on grounds of gender.
Gender-Neutral Job Advertisements
Discrimination on the grounds of gender must be prevented in accordance with the German General Act on Equal Treatment (Allgemeines Gleichbehandlungsgesetz, AGG). If employers disregard this rule, they face strict liability damages claims and compensation claims on the part of an affected employee. Also, the intangible damage suffered in the form of damage to a company’s reputation in case of gender discrimination is not to be underestimated, especially given the new power of social media where everyone is in the position to cause a PR crisis (aka shitstorm) for a company by just one tweet or post.
Employers must, in particular, design job advertisements in a gender-neutral manner. Since the ruling of the BVerfG, it must be assumed that the term “gender” no longer solely refers to men and women but includes individuals who do not belong to either the male or the female gender.
If one interprets section 1 AGG against the background of the recent ruling, the prohibition of gender discrimination will now no longer only apply to men and women but also to individuals who do not belong to either the male or the female gender. Consequently, there is a strong argument in favor of no longer addressing job advertisements only to women or men but also to a third gender in order to comply with the principle of gender neutrality as newly established by the BVerfG.
What Does the Ruling Mean in Practice?
Employers are well advised to review their current practice regarding job advertisements now and, in any event, no later than when the new law enters into force, presumably on January 1, 2019. The adjustment of job advertisements is also advisable in view of the reversal of the burden of proof under the AGG. If a job advertisement is placed without reference to the third gender, this will likely constitute a fact that gives rise to the presumption that this gender has been discriminated against. As a result, in the event of a dispute, the employer would have to rebut this presumption.
Gender-neutral broader language and job descriptions continue to be safe in view of a possible discrimination on the basis of gender. There is a strong tendency amongst legal advisors, however, to expressly make reference to the third gender in job advertisements. Employers should make it clear in their job advertisements that they are open to all kinds of people, regardless of their gender, and that they welcome their applications.
In this context, if no neutral job title can be found, it may be appropriate to include designations in brackets. The previous addition “(m/f)” does not take account of the third gender and therefore will likely give rise to a presumption of discrimination on the grounds of gender. The mere notice that “m/f” is deemed to include all individuals will likely not suffice to avoid any sanctions under anti-discrimination law. Based on the term “inter/diverse” suggested by the BVerfG, the designation in brackets should be extended to read “(m/f/d),” “(m/f/i)” or “(m/f/x)”.
Action to Take for Employers
Regardless of the need for action which has now clearly arisen on the part of the legislature, employers should pay closer intention to potential gender discrimination and look into the practical consequences of the ruling. Regardless of the decision, employers should create a work environment that is free from discrimination by also taking into account different gender identities.
As the law in this area continues to develop, here are some tips for employers looking to be proactive and minimize risk:
- If you have not already, consider rewriting non-discrimination and anti-harassment policies to include gender identity and train employees on it.
- Re-examining gender-based dress codes is a good idea.
- Employees should have access to restrooms consistent with their gender identity: If possible, add a gender-neutral option or a single-occupant restroom.
- Keep tabs on case law and legislation so you are prepared.
In practice, managing directors (Geschäftsführer) frequently try to attack the validity of a dismissal and bring unfair dismissal claims. In a recent decision, the Federal Labor Court (Bundesarbeitsgericht) has again rejected such claims. The court reiterates that managing directors do not enjoy rights of protection against dismissal if their appointment as managing director has been in place at the time notice of termination was given.
The German Dismissal Protection Act Does Not Apply to Managing Directors
Pursuant to section 14(1) no. 1 of the German Dismissal Protection Act (Kündigungsschutzgesetz, KSchG), the provisions on dismissal protection
“do not apply, within the operation of a legal entity, to the members of a corporate body which has been appointed to legally represent the legal entity“.